The Age of Kali: Indian Travels & Encounters.
William Dalrymple.
Lonely Planet Publications. 2000. $14.95.
Reviewed by Stephanie McMillan
Appeared in City Link, May, 2000.
A review by The Times (UK) excerpted on the back cover calls this book a
"love
affair" with the Indian subcontinent, and in the introduction Dalrymple
himself
refers to it as "a work of love." It's true that Dalrymple has freely chosen
India as his residence for ten years, so he must have some sort of positive
feelings about it. It is unclear, however, whether this book is motivated by
love or by fascination, two entirely different things.
The chapters, which are distinct pieces written in the style of travel
articles
for newspapers or magazines (indeed most of the articles included in the
book
were previously published as such), lead the reader through several regions
of
India, as well as Sri Lanka and Pakistan.
The book is, admittedly, interesting and rich in detail. Dalrymple provides
a
look at phenomena largely unfamiliar to the western reader, such as caste
conflict, the inexorable forces that lead politicians into thuggery, and
widow-burning. Yet one gets the sense that his intention to inform is
contaminated with a desire to shock and titillate. This is apparent in both
his
range of topics, particularly the individuals he chooses to profile, as well
as
the tone he often takes in his commentary. He seems at times to don the
persona
of a slightly superior guide, pointing out extremes of irony and weirdness
to
the wide-eyed tourist. His focus is on eccentric, marginal characters, such
as a
famous Sikh rock star who pretends to be Madonna's friend, a woman who grows
rich by writing widely vilified risque novels, and Kalashnikov-toting drug
barons of the Khyber Pass.
Dalrymple's excessive attention to the lurid and sensational seems at times
a
substitute for honest or thoughtful analysis. Though his historical
background
notes are often in-depth and quite illuminating, the descriptive details he
employs seem rather to accentuate the peculiarity of his subjects than to
enlighten those who are seeking knowledge about another culture.
What is a minor annoyance when applied to rock stars and pornographers,
becomes
offensive when describing social conflict and progressive activism.
Dalrymple
repeatedly shows insensitive disregard for the seriousness of people who
are, in
various ways, sincerely struggling against injustice and the legacies of
colonialism.
It must be acknowledged that seeking out the Tamil Tigers (who are fighting
for
a separate homeland in Sri Lanka) took some courage, and it was quite an
accomplishment to gain access to them. However Dalrymple squandered the
opportunity to shed light on their aims and methods, in favor of portraying
particularly the women guerrillas one-dimensionally as "ranting,"
"ruthless,"
and "fanatic," and insulting them by repeatedly referring to their physical
attractiveness. "They look sweet and naïve, but they can be alarmingly
doctrinaire and severe. None more so than their leader, the tall and lovely
Lieutenant Jaya, a political science graduate with a taste for
incomprehensible
Maoist jargon." Incomprehensible to Dalrymple, perhaps, but not to the
determined Tigers nor to their large number of local supporters. If the
Tigers
read this essay, they would likely regret their hospitality to the foreign
journalist.
Dalrymple's characterization of protests in Bangalore against the 1997 Miss
World contest and a Kentucky Fried Chicken franchise similarly revealed a
lack
of comprehension and depth. After his initial assumption that the protests
represented a "spectacular overreaction," he did grant that legitimate
reasons
may lie below the surface. He then proceeded to mischaracterize these
reasons as
a "fear of progress." That Miss World and western fast food represent
"progress"
is a matter of opinion and Dalrymple may very well feel they do; however to
characterize the people's rejection of them as "fear of progress" betrays
ignorance of the workings of cultural imperialism which heralds and
accompanies
economic exploitation. The protesters perceive these supposedly innocuous
western phenomena as the visible tip of a much more dangerous iceberg (a
perception no longer so incomprehensible even in the west - especially
following
the anti-WTO/IMF/World Bank protests in Seattle and Washington, D.C.).
Dalrymple
even stoops to sniping in a mean-spirited way at women who believe, as many
do,
that Miss World fosters unnatural standards of beauty, plastic surgery, and
rape. "Pramilla Nesargi painted a grim picture of Colonel Sanders and the
Miss
World organization as sinister Riders of the Apocalypse, one of them
descending
on Bangalore bearing carcinogenic chicken nuggets to poison the unsuspecting
Hindu youth, while the other perverted the morals of any left alive by the
Kentucky plague."
Worse, he asserts that foreign competition has benefited the country, and
uses
the example of Cargill, which markets hybrid seeds and has bankrupted many
local
seed producers. Hybrid seeds have become a target of widespread public
outrage
in many parts of the world (including India) for their characteristic of
growing
into plants that don't re-seed in turn, forcing peasants into a lifetime of
crippling dependency on the corporations that produce them. Dalrymple
doesn't
mention this, yet accuses those who reject this "progress" of having
"glaring
holes in (their) arguments," and of being "more emotional than logical."
Dalrymple doesn't project much feeling in his writing save ironic amusement,
sarcasm and fascination with the outlandish. After living in India for ten
years, is he really as astonished by the sights and characters as he
portrays
himself to be, or is this tone affected for the benefit of sheltered readers
of
the west?
The essays in The Age of Kali may have made for entertaining, relatively
informative travel pieces in the magazines where most of them first
appeared.
Their collective value as an in-depth, clear-headed view of specific
fragments
of India's vast and complex society is, however, questionable.
home |
writings
|